Human Nature and the Constitution

All the heated discussion (mosque debate) can be seen as valuable because it provides further evidence that we as a collective are rising to a higher level of consciousnes. This is exactly what will save us all from the disastrous effects of the excesses of ego the prevention of which the American constitution was created. The world is changing and it is impossible to stem the tide.

It is interesting to reflect on the fact that the internal logic of the Constitution is based on a false premise... that ego-centric self-interest is characteristic of human nature. It is this view which underlies the dualistic philosophy of balanced government as the means to control people's freedom for the pursuit of their so-called 'happiness'. This all has far-reaching implications. See the following: "From a humanistic standpoint there is a serious dilemma in the philosophy of the Fathers, which derives from their conception of man. They thought man was a creature of rapacious self-interest, and yet they wanted him to be free - free in essence, to contend, to engage in an umpired strife, to use property to get property. They accepted the mercantile image of life as an eternal battleground, and assumed the Hobbesian war of each against all; they did not propose to put an end to this war, but merely to stabilize it and make it less murderous. They had no hope and they offered none for any ultimate organic change in the way men conduct themselves. The result was that while they thought self-interest the most dangerous and unbrookable quality of man, they necessarily underwrote it in trying to control it. They succeeded in both respects: under the competitive capitalism of the nineteenth century America continued to be an arena for various grasping and contending interests, and the federal government continued to provide a stable and acceptable medium within which they could contend; further it usually showed the wholesome bias on behalf of property which the Fathers expected. But no man who is as well abreast of modern science as the Fathers were of eighteenth science, believes any longer in unchanging human nature. Modern humanistic thinkers who seek for a means by which society may transcend eternal conflict and rigid adherence to property rights as its integrating principles can expect no answer in the philosophy of balanced governmment as it was set down by the Constitution-makers of 1787". (Richard Hofstadter 'The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism' in Horowitz, R.H. (Ed) The Moral Foundations of the American Republic. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Oceania 1986 p. 73)